Platform · Course generation
Turn the policy you already have into training people finish.
Upload a document, a deck, or a brief. TrainingRamp reads it, works out what a person has to know and do, and drafts the objectives, lessons, checks, scenario, and assessment. Your expert reviews and approves. Nothing reaches an employee before they do.
Illustrative view. Document and clause references are examples.
What goes in
Start from what your organisation already wrote.
Most of the knowledge a workforce needs is already documented somewhere, in a form nobody wants to read. Generation starts there rather than from a blank page.
Policies and procedures
Upload the controlled document. Clause structure, defined terms, and obligations are read as structure, not as flat text.
Decks and LMS exports
Bring across what you already built. Existing slides and SCORM packages become a starting draft rather than dead weight.
A written brief
Describe the capability a role needs in a sentence. Useful when the knowledge lives in practice rather than in a document.
An expert interview
Record a subject-matter expert talking through the work. What they know becomes a module instead of leaving when they do.
What comes out
Anatomy of a generated module.
Six parts, every time. A module that stops at explanation is a document with a progress bar, so each part exists to move a person from reading to demonstrating.
-
01
Learning objectives
Four to eight statements of what a person will be able to do, written against the source obligations.
Why it is there Objectives make the module assessable. Without them there is nothing to measure competency against.
-
02
Lessons
Segmented explanation, each lesson covering one obligation or procedure, sized to eight to twelve minutes.
Why it is there Short lessons survive shift work. A person can finish one between jobs rather than abandoning a long course.
-
03
Knowledge checks
Low-stakes questions placed inside each lesson, with feedback that explains the reasoning.
Why it is there Checking as you go catches misunderstanding while it is still cheap to correct.
-
04
Workplace scenario
A branching situation drawn from the setting the policy actually governs.
Why it is there Recall is not competency. A scenario asks a person to apply the rule under the conditions they will meet.
-
05
Graded assessment
A final item set mapped back to each objective, with a pass mark you set.
Why it is there This is the record that satisfies an auditor asking whether the person could do the work.
-
06
Evidence record
Attempt history, responses, timestamps, and the source version the module was generated from.
Why it is there Competency you cannot evidence is competency you cannot defend at review.
How generation works
Five stages, and a person at the end of them.
-
01
Ingest
Read the source in place. Document structure, headings, defined terms, and clause numbering are preserved rather than flattened.
-
02
Extract requirements
Separate what a person must know from what the document says for legal or administrative reasons. Obligations become candidate objectives.
-
03
Structure
Group obligations into lessons, order them by dependency, and size each to the attention a working shift allows.
-
04
Draft
Write the lessons, checks, scenario, and assessment against the objectives, at the reading level and tone you set.
-
05
Review gate
Route to your subject-matter expert. Nothing publishes to a learner until a named person approves it.
Review and control
Your expert has the last word.
Generation does the drafting your instructional designers never had time for. It does not decide what your organisation tells its workforce. That decision stays with a named person, and the record shows who made it.
-
Approval before publication
A generated module sits in draft until an expert you nominate approves it. Approval is recorded against their name and the version.
-
Tone and reading level
Set the register and target reading level per audience. Frontline modules and executive briefings come out of the same source reading differently.
-
Version tracking
When a source document changes, affected modules are flagged with the specific clauses that moved, not a blanket alert.
-
Edit and roll back
Edit any generated element directly. Every change is versioned, and you can return to an earlier approved state.
Accuracy and traceability
Grounded in your material, and provably so.
The reasonable objection to AI-written training is that it might be confidently wrong about something that matters. The answer is not reassurance. It is traceability, a review gate, and a record that survives an audit.
Every claim cites its clause
Generated statements carry a reference back to the source passage. A reviewer checks the citation rather than the whole module.
Gaps are raised, not filled
Where the source does not answer a question the module needs to answer, it is flagged for a human. Nothing is supplied from outside your material.
Full generation history
Source version, generation time, model configuration, reviewer, and approval time are retained for the life of the record.
Accessibility and reading level
Training nobody can read is training nobody completes.
WCAG 2.2 AA output
Generated modules conform, not just the platform around them. Structure, contrast, and focus order are part of the output.
Reading level control
Target a plain-English level and see the measured result before approving. Comprehension is not a bonus feature in safety training.
Captions and transcripts
Any audio or video element is generated with a caption track and a full transcript.
Authoring time
Weeks of authoring, returned to your team.
Figures below are placeholders. Replace with measured results from your own pilot before launch.
6 min
Median time to first draft
11 wks
Typical authoring time replaced
1 SME
People needed to review, not author
Works with
Generation is one part of the loop.
- Skills-gap mapping The gap map decides which modules get generated next, so authoring effort follows measured need.
- Adaptive learning paths Generated modules are sequenced per employee against their role and prior results.
- Competency assessment The assessment generated with the module is the same one that produces the competency record.
Questions we get asked
The hard ones, answered.
If your question is not here, ask it on the demo call. We would rather answer it before you buy than after.
-
Does it invent content that is not in our source material?
No. Generation is grounded in what you provide. Where the source does not cover something the module needs, the gap is flagged for a human decision rather than filled from general knowledge. Every generated statement carries a reference back to the passage it came from, so a reviewer can verify it in seconds.
-
Who owns the generated modules?
You do. Your source material remains yours, and the modules generated from it are your content. Export at any time in standard formats, including SCORM and xAPI, and take them with you if you leave.
-
What happens when the underlying policy changes?
Upload the new version. Affected modules are flagged with the specific clauses that changed and what they touched, so your expert reviews the delta rather than re-reading the whole module. Previously approved versions stay in the record.
-
Can our instructional designers edit the output?
Yes, at every level. Rewrite an objective, replace a scenario, adjust an assessment item, or discard a lesson. Edits are versioned alongside generated content, and generation can be re-run on a single section without disturbing approved work.
-
Does it handle our internal terminology and role titles?
Terms defined in your source documents are used as defined. You can also maintain a glossary at the organisation level so that the same term is used consistently across every module, including where your usage differs from the industry norm.